Skip to content

Ottawa Judge Beaudoin Refuses to Hear Motion on Open Court Principle

February 9, 2012

Justice Robert Beaudoin refused yesterday to hear a motion to allow public observation of certain court processes in the defamation lawsuit of Joanne St. Lewis vs. Denis Rancourt.  The motion was submitted by the defendant, former U of O physics professor Rancourt, who is being sued for $1 million in damages by U of O law professor St. Lewis.  Ms. St. Lewis is represented by her lawyer, Richard Dearden.  All of Ms. St. Lewis’ legal fees are paid for by the U of O.

Mr. Rancourt’s “Open Court Motion” sought to allow members of the public to observe cross-examinations of witnesses on their affidavits, which are submitted as evidence in procedural motions pertaining to the case.  Justice Beaudoin summarily decided not to allow the motion to proceed, stating that affidavit examinations are “out of court” and therefore not subject to the “open court principle.”  The Justice stated multiple times that he would not “delay” examinations in the case to deal with Mr. Rancourt’s Open Court Motion.

The case has been well-publicized in the mainstream and alternative media, and issues of public access and reporting of the legal process have featured repeatedly.  I attended the Sept. 6, 2011 cross-examination of Mr. Rancourt’s affidavit in an earlier motion, and reported on this blog about Mr. Dearden’s aggressive cross-examination behaviour in that instance.  Following my report, Mr. Dearden requested a ruling from Master Calum MacLeod on Oct. 6, 2011 that public observers would be excluded from a follow-up cross-examination on the same affidavit, to be held on Oct. 14, 2011.  The Master’s ruling received comment on the SLAW law blog.

When informed of the Oct. 6 ruling, Justice Beaudoin informed the court 1) that Mr. Rancourt had missed the deadline to appeal that ruling, and 2) that he was “repeating the order” of the Master.  At the request of Mr. Rancourt, the judge confirmed that his final ruling on the matter would say that he “explicitly refused” to allow Mr. Rancourt’s motion to appear before the court.

U of O President, Mr. Allan Rock will be among the upcoming witnesses in the case.  Mr. Rock will be examined out of court on his affidavit in relation to the defendant’s Champerty motion, which argues for a dismissal of the suit on the basis that the University is improperly financing and benefitting from it.

Advertisements
5 Comments leave one →
  1. joe smith permalink
    May 9, 2012 1:22 pm

    Absolutely facinating. It showcases our broken court system here in Ottawa.

    Sad, but a good education opportunity for any students reading this material.

    Here we have one judge backing up the decision of another judge…nothing seems too unusual here right. But go ahead and dig a little deeper. How about you conduct a little private poll for the sake of your education.

    Go and ask any practicing lawyer in Ottawa who spends time in either the Ottawa Civil or Family Courts. Ask them “Who are the two least competent Judges in the Ottawa court system ?” I can almost guarantee you that these two names (Robert Beaudion & Calum MacLeod) will come up eight or nine times out of ten. What does that say ? Especially if you happen to get “tag teamed” by them, as this unfortunate individual did.

    And how much is this ultimately costing our citizens financially and otherwise??

    Another one of Justice Beaudion’s tricks is that his Court Clerk dismisses the court stenographer/reporter before the motion is heard so that there is no written record of what took place at a motion other the the Judge’s own ruling and notes. Good luck to any lawyer brave or foolish enough to attempt to question or appeal one of these proceedings. This practice also prevents any possible future attempt at Judicial Review.

    In short, a total subversion of our legal system here in Ottawa by two rotten apples.

    These two Justice’s need to be removed from the bench asap, for the greater good of our society and also to set an example to our law students that there are in fact checks and balances in the system, and its not utterly and hopelessly broken.

Trackbacks

  1. Ottawa Judge Robert J. Smith Excludes Student Media Reporter from Court Transparency Issue « A Student's-Eye View
  2. University of Ottawa Engaged in SLAPP-Suit Against Former Professor: Donations Needed « Joanne St. Lewis vs. Denis Rancourt
  3. University of Ottawa Engaged in SLAPP-Suit Against Former Professor — Student Senators Speak Out | Brave New World
  4. University of Ottawa Engaged in SLAPP-Suit Against Former Professor – Student Senators Speak Out by Hazel Gashoka and Joseph Hickey | | Encompassing CrescentEncompassing Crescent

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: